References

1. 1. Buszewski B., Noga S. Hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC) – A powerful separation technique // Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2012. V. 402. P. 231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-011-5308-5
2. 2. Chester T.L. Recent developments in high-performance liquid chromatography stationary phases // Anal. Chem. 2013. V. 85. № 2. P. 579. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac303180y
3. 3. Li S., Li Z., Zhang F., Geng H., Yang B. A polymerbased zwitterionic stationary phase for hydrophilic interaction chromatography // Talanta. 2020. V. 216. Article 120927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2020.120927
4. 4. Guo H., Liu R., Yang J., Yang B., Liang X., Chu C. A novel click lysine zwitterionic stationary phase for hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography // J. Chromatogr. A. 2012. V. 1223. P. 47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2011.12.033
5. 5. Nesterenko E.P., Nesterenko P.N., Paull B. Zwitterionic ion-exchangers in ion chromatography: A review of recent developments // Anal. Chim. Acta. 2009. V. 652. P. 3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2009.06.010
6. 6. Jandera P., Janas P. Recent advances in stationary phases and understanding of retention in hydrophilic interaction chromatography. A review // Anal. Chim. Acta. 2017. V. 967. P. 12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2017.01.060
7. 7. Wang X., Zhu T., Wang X., Peng H., Zhou G., Peng J. Preparation of two zwitterionic polymer functionalized stationary phases and comparative evaluation under mixed-mode of reversed phase/ hydrophilic interaction/ion exchange chromatography // J. Chromatogr. A. 2024. V. 1714. Article 464586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2023.464586
8. 8. Bo C., Wang X., Wang C., Wei Y. Preparation of hydrophilic interaction/ion-exchange mixed-mode chromatographic stationary phase with adjustable selectivity by controlling different ratios of the co-monomers // J. Chromatogr. A. 2017. V. 1487. P. 201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2017.01.061
9. 9. Nesterenko P.N., Haddad P.R. Zwitterionic ion-exchangers in liquid chromatography // Anal. Sci. 2000. V. 16. P. 565. https://doi.org/10.2116/analsci.16.565
10. 10. Peng H., Wang X., Peng J., He Y., Chen Y., Chen F., Li S. Preparation and evaluation of surface-bonded phenylglycine zwitterionic stationary phase // Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2018. V. 410. № 23. P. 5941. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-018-1211-7
11. 11. Чернобровкина А.В, Смоленков А.Д., Шпигун О.А. Гидрофильная хроматография – перспективный метод определения полярных веществ // Лаб. Про. 2018. № 4. С. 76. https://doi.org/10.32757/2619-0923.2018.4.4.76.92
12. 12. Kawase I., Wah L.L., Takeuchi T. Investigation of chromatographic performance of hyperbranched amine-modified stationary phases in ion chromatography // Chromatography. 2017. V. 38. № 1. P. 9. https://doi.org/10.15583/jpchrom.2016.018
13. 13. Popov A.S., Spiridonov K.A., Uzhel A.S., Smolenkov A.D., Chernobrovkina A.V., Zatirakha A.V. Prospects of using hyperbranched stationary phase based on poly(styrene-divinylbenzene) in mixed-mode chromatography // J. Chromatogr. A. 2021. V. 1642. P. 11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2021.462010
14. 14. Uzhel A.S., Zatirakha A.V., Smirnov K.N., Smolenkov A.D., Shpigun O.A. Anion exchangers with negatively charged functionalities in hyperbranched ion-exchange layers for ion chromatography // J. Chromatogr. A. 2017. V. 1482. P. 56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2016.12.066
15. 15. Uzhel A.S., Gorbovskaya A.V., Zatirakha A.V., Smolenkov A.D., Shpigun O.A. Manipulating selectivity of covalently-bonded hyperbranched anion exchangers toward organic acids. Part I: Influence of primary amine substituents in the internal part of the functional layer // J. Chromatogr. A. 2019. V. 1589. P. 65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2018.12.052
16. 16. Uzhel A.S., Gorbovskaya A.V., Zatirakha A.V., Smolenkov A.D., Shpigun O.A. Manipulating selectivity of covalently-bonded hyperbranched anion exchangers toward organic acids. Part II: Effect of mono- and dicarboxylic amino acids in the internal part of the functional layer // J. Chromatogr. A. 2019. V. 1596. P. 117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2019.03.006
17. 17. Uzhel A.S., Zatirakha A.V., Smolenkov A.D., Shpigun O.A. Quantification of inorganic anions and organic acids in apple and orange juices using novel covalently-bonded hyperbranched anion exchanger with improved selectivity // J. Chromatogr. A. 2018. V. 1567. P. 130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2018.06.065
18. 18. Chikurova N.Yu., Shemiakina A.O., Shpigun O.A., Chernobrovkina A.V. Multicomponent Ugi reaction as a tool for fast and easy preparation of stationary phases for hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography. Part I: The influence of attachment and spacing of the functional ligand obtained via the Ugi reaction // J. Chromatogr. A. 2022. V. 1666. Article 462804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2022.462804
19. 19. Kawachi Y., Ikegami T., Takubo H., Ikegami Y., Miyamoto M., Tanaka N. Chromatographic characterization of hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography stationary phases: Hydrophilicity, charge effects, structural selectivity, and separation efficiency // J. Chromatogr. A. 2011. V. 1218. № 35. P. 5903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2011.06.048